[Submitted on 5 May 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:AI democratization is not primarily a question of matching frontier-scale generality; it is a question of whether capable models can be selected, audited, and specialized under hardware and governance constraints that ordinary institutions can actually satisfy. This paper studies that problem through a controlled evaluation of nine open-weight language models between 135M and 3B parameters on a 1,085-example, 16-topic multiple-choice benchmark designed for structured local deployment. The benchmark emphasizes symbolic precision, constrained formatting, extraction, and short-horizon semantic decision making under a strict one-letter output protocol. A shared parameter-efficient fine-tuning pipeline then adapts a subset of models using 4-bit NF4 quantization with DoRA/LoRA-style adapters on an NVIDIA L4-class budget. In base evaluation, Qwen Coder 3B leads at 75.67% strict accuracy, followed by Qwen2.5 1.5B at 67.10%, Qwen3.5 2B at 64.98%, and Granite 3.3 2B at 64.61%. On the shared 108-example held-out fine-tuning split, adaptation improves Qwen Coder 3B by +26.85 points, SmolLM2 1.7B by +25.92, Qwen2.5 1.5B by +19.44, SmolLM2 360M by +10.18, and SmolLM2 135M by +5.55. Across ranking, topic-level heterogeneity, difficulty strata, failure composition, efficiency frontiers, and topic-conditioned transfer, the same conclusion recurs: a disciplined workflow of benchmark construction, cross-model evaluation, and low-cost specialization already makes a subset of sub-3B models viable as local experts for structured niche workloads.

Submission history

From: Daniel Cersosimo [view email]
[v1] Tue, 5 May 2026 02:36:09 UTC (1,731 KB)